1977 OPC Star Wars Stickers #46 Chewie gets riled! — Raw

Asking range
Confirmed sales
Live listings
| Price | Type | Est. grade (ours) | Est. ROI after grading | Listing (opens eBay) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $7.10 | Buy It Now | 6 (5–8) | — | 1977 Topps/O-Pee-Chee Star Wars Stickers Chewbacca #46 12p5 on eBay |
![]() | $7.72 | Buy It Now | 6 (5–7) | — | 1977 Topps/O-Pee-Chee Star Wars Stickers Chewbacca #46 2f4 on eBay |
![]() | $14.63 | Buy It Now | 6 (5–7) | — | 1977 Topps/O-Pee-Chee Star Wars Stickers Chewbacca #46 1e8j on eBay |
![]() | $23.24 | Buy It Now | 6 (4–7) | — | 1977 Topps/O-Pee-Chee Star Wars Stickers Chewbacca #46 0dk on eBay |
Index grading notes

Centering: the red/orange border appears slightly tighter on the right side vs. left, and slightly tighter on top vs. bottom — estimated roughly 60/40 L/R and 55/45 T/B, which is acceptable but the image angle and COMC watermark limit precision. Corners are not individually visible at resolution sufficient for a tight assessment, but no obvious blunting or rounding is apparent at this zoom level. Surface gloss appears present but the COMC watermark obscures the center lower third, preventing assessment of any print defects, staining, or surface wear in that zone. Given the sticker's inherent die-cut format and the image limitations, a range of 5–8 is honest; EX-MT (6) is the point estimate pending a clean corner and surface inspection.

Centering estimate: left/right borders appear roughly 55/45 and top/bottom roughly 60/40 — acceptable for the grade range. The red filmstrip border shows no obvious chipping or major surface wear visible at this resolution. Corners appear slightly soft but not dramatically rounded, suggesting light handling wear consistent with EX-MT to NM range. Surface gloss appears intact with no obvious creases or staining visible, though the photo does not permit close corner inspection or back assessment. The sticker peel integrity cannot be assessed from this image, which is a meaningful unknown for this issue.

Centering: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R), top border slightly wider than bottom (~55/45 T/B) — centering is reasonably tight and not a major grade killer. Corners: the top-left and top-right corners appear to show light wear/slight rounding; bottom corners are harder to assess due to the bottom caption area but appear similar. Surface: image gloss looks decent with no obvious creases visible, print quality appears typical for this issue. The COMC watermark and sleeve glare limit detailed corner and surface inspection, warranting a widened range; a crease or heavier corner wear not visible at this resolution could pull this toward a 5.

Centering estimate: left/right borders appear roughly 50/50 with the filmstrip-style sticker border; top/bottom appears slightly tighter on top, approximately 55/45 — centering looks acceptable but image compression limits precision. Corners are difficult to assess at this resolution; no obvious heavy rounding is visible but fine corner wear cannot be ruled out. Surface appears to retain reasonable gloss with no obvious creases or staining visible, though the COMC watermark obscures the lower third of the card. Image quality is too compressed and partially obstructed to confidently assess corners and edge wear; range is widened accordingly.