1966 Topps Batman Bat Laffs #25 Batman and Robin — Raw

Asking range
Confirmed sales
Live listings
| Price | Type | Est. grade (ours) | Est. ROI after grading | Listing (opens eBay) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $4.20 | Auction | pending | — | 1966 Batman (Smaller Version) - BAT LAFFS - Card Number 25 |
![]() | $8.07 | Buy It Now | 1 (1–2) | — | 1966 Bat Laffs Batman Robin Batmobile in (No Movie Promo on Back) #25 READ 0nr3 |
![]() | $10.70 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–6) | — | 1966 BATMAN BAT LAFFS COLOR SERIE HIGH GRADE NO25 BATMAN ROBIN NO112 |
![]() | $11.47 | Buy It Now | 3 (2–4) | — | 1966 Topps Bat Laffs Batman Robin Burt Ward Adam West #25 READ 0nr3 |
![]() | $18.08 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–6) | — | 1966 Topps Bat Laffs Batman Robin Batmobile in (No Movie Promo on Back) #25 06mi |
Index grading notes

The seller's note explicitly flags 'paper loss' and the photo confirms it — there is visible surface paper loss/scuffing in the upper-left quadrant of the card face, a defining PR-FR defect. Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (approx 70/30 L/R), top and bottom borders appear roughly 55/45 T/B, so centering is off but not the primary concern. Corners show rounding consistent with heavy handling. The paper loss alone is a grade-capping defect under PSA standards, pushing this into the PR-1 to GOOD-2 range; the surface damage is severe enough that PSA-1 is the most likely outcome, though a GOOD-2 is possible if PSA judges the paper loss as limited in scope on the actual card versus photo compression.

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (~60/40 L/R favoring right), top border slightly narrower than bottom (~55/45 T/B) — centering is off but not severely so, no adjacent card printing visible so no miscut. Corners appear to have light-to-moderate rounding, consistent with a 5 EX range, though the low-resolution scan makes precise corner assessment difficult. Surface gloss appears partially intact with some gloss loss visible across the image area; no obvious creases are detectable but the photo resolution prevents confident crease exclusion. The scan quality is the primary limitation here — a sharper image would be needed to confidently separate EX (5) from VG-EX (4) or EX-MT (6), hence the widened range.

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (approximately 70/30 L/R), top and bottom borders appear closer to 55/45 T/B — centering is off but not miscut territory. The seller notation 'READ' in the title suggests undisclosed condition issues, and the note 'corner wear' is visible in the image caption. Corners show visible rounding and wear consistent with a VG range card; the upper-left and lower-right corners appear most affected. Surface gloss appears diminished with possible light creasing, though the COMC watermark and photo resolution obscure fine surface detail. Given the corner wear noted and visible, and the likelihood of additional undisclosed flaws per the seller's cryptic title, estimating VG (3) as the point grade with range 2–4 depending on what the back and a closer inspection reveal.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly narrower than right (approx 55/45 L/R), top border appears slightly narrower than bottom (approx 55/45 T/B) — centering is acceptable but not tight. Corners show light-to-moderate rounding visible at all four tips, most notably the bottom corners, consistent with a PSA 4-5 range. Edges appear reasonably clean with no obvious nicks visible at scan resolution, consistent with normal vintage handling. Surface shows the CoMC watermark obscuring the lower third, making crease detection difficult there, but no obvious creases or heavy gloss loss are apparent in the visible areas; overall gloss appears moderate, suggesting normal age-related wear without significant surface damage. The rough cut texture on the edges is normal for this set and is not penalized. Given corner rounding and the obscured surface area limiting confidence, range is 4–6 with a point estimate of 5 (EX).
