21,263 live listings tracked4,947 card classes309 confirmed salesupdated 0 min ago
1966 Batman

1966 Topps Batman Bat Laffs #25 Batman and Robin

1966 Topps Batman Bat Laffs #25 Batman and Robin
Buy it now — $2.49 ›cheapest of 10 live listings on eBay
10live listings
0confirmed sales
6grades tracked

Every grade of this card

Raw and graded copies tracked side by side. Prices are asking prices and current bids; comps are confirmed sales.
GradeLiveAsking rangeLast confirmed saleEst. grade (ours)
Raw5$8.07 – $18.083.5
TAG ?1$2.49
PSA 42$69.95 – $69.954.0
CGC 50
CGC 60
PSA 72$90.00 – $99.99

Index grading notes

Estimated grades are this site’s opinion, derived from the seller’s photo and expressed on the PSA scale. Not affiliated with or endorsed by PSA; not a guarantee of any grading outcome.
1966 Batman Color #25 BATMAN & ROBIN ! ICONIC DUO! PSA VG-EX
Estimated grade: 4 (4–4) · HIGH confidence · asking $69.95

Card is already slabbed by PSA and labeled VG-EX 4, which is consistent with what the image shows. Centering appears approximately 75/25 left-to-right and roughly 80/20 top-to-bottom, acceptable for VG-EX. Corners show light-to-moderate rounding visible even through the slab, consistent with a 4 grade. Surface gloss appears reduced but no severe creasing is evident from this angle; minor wear across the card face is consistent with the stated grade. Since this is a confirmed PSA slab with serial number 122480424, the grade of VG-EX 4 is accepted as authoritative — the visual evidence does not contradict it.

1966 Topps Bat Laffs Batman Robin Batmobile in (No Movie Pro
Estimated grade: 5 (4–6) · MEDIUM confidence · asking $18.08

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly narrower than right (approx 55/45 L/R), top border appears slightly narrower than bottom (approx 55/45 T/B) — centering is acceptable but not tight. Corners show light-to-moderate rounding visible at all four tips, most notably the bottom corners, consistent with a PSA 4-5 range. Edges appear reasonably clean with no obvious nicks visible at scan resolution, consistent with normal vintage handling. Surface shows the CoMC watermark obscuring the lower third, making crease detection difficult there, but no obvious creases or heavy gloss loss are apparent in the visible areas; overall gloss appears moderate, suggesting normal age-related wear without significant surface damage. The rough cut texture on the edges is normal for this set and is not penalized. Given corner rounding and the obscured surface area limiting confidence, range is 4–6 with a point estimate of 5 (EX).

1966 Topps Bat Laffs Batman Robin Burt Ward Adam West #25 RE
Estimated grade: 3 (2–4) · MEDIUM confidence · asking $11.47

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (approximately 70/30 L/R), top and bottom borders appear closer to 55/45 T/B — centering is off but not miscut territory. The seller notation 'READ' in the title suggests undisclosed condition issues, and the note 'corner wear' is visible in the image caption. Corners show visible rounding and wear consistent with a VG range card; the upper-left and lower-right corners appear most affected. Surface gloss appears diminished with possible light creasing, though the COMC watermark and photo resolution obscure fine surface detail. Given the corner wear noted and visible, and the likelihood of additional undisclosed flaws per the seller's cryptic title, estimating VG (3) as the point grade with range 2–4 depending on what the back and a closer inspection reveal.

1966 BATMAN BAT LAFFS COLOR SERIE  HIGH GRADE NO25  BATMAN R
Estimated grade: 5 (4–6) · LOW confidence · asking $10.70

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (~60/40 L/R favoring right), top border slightly narrower than bottom (~55/45 T/B) — centering is off but not severely so, no adjacent card printing visible so no miscut. Corners appear to have light-to-moderate rounding, consistent with a 5 EX range, though the low-resolution scan makes precise corner assessment difficult. Surface gloss appears partially intact with some gloss loss visible across the image area; no obvious creases are detectable but the photo resolution prevents confident crease exclusion. The scan quality is the primary limitation here — a sharper image would be needed to confidently separate EX (5) from VG-EX (4) or EX-MT (6), hence the widened range.