1966 Topps Batman Red Bat #44A Batman on Broadway — Raw

This card in every grade
| Holder | Listed | Cheapest | Dearest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 17 | $2.88 | $10.50 |
| PSA 3 | 1 | $69.99 | — |
| GMA 3 | 1 | $10.00 | — |
| PSA 4 | 1 | $79.99 | — |
| PSA 4.5 | 1 | $84.99 | — |
Asking range
Confirmed sales
| Date | Price | Basis | Listing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-15 | $1.99 | HIGH · final bid | 1966 Topps Batman Series A (Red Bat Logo) #44A Batman on Broadway |
| 2026-09-12 | $8.50 | HIGH · final bid | 1966 Topps Batman A Series (Red Bat Logo) Batman on Broadway #44A READ |
| 2026-09-11 | $2.31 | HIGH · final bid | 1966 Topps Batman A Series (Red Bat Logo) Batman on Broadway #44A |
| 2026-09-08 | $1.25 | HIGH · final bid | Batman on Broadway 1966 Topps Series A Red Bat Logo #44A |
| 2026-09-01 | $3.25 | HIGH · final bid | 1966 Topps Batman A Series (Red Bat Logo) Batman on Broadway #44A |
| 2026-08-29 | $23.50 | HIGH · final bid | 1966 Batman A Series Red Bat # 44A Batman on Broadway NM Well Centered |
| 2026-08-17 | $7.95 | HIGH · final bid | (4) 1966 Topps Batman Red Bat Cards #44A, 33A, 10A, 3A - Good |
| 2026-08-11 | $7.95 | HIGH · final bid | (4) 1966 Topps Batman Red Bat Cards #44A, 37A, 21A, 20A, Good |
Live listings
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (roughly 70/30 left-to-right), top border slightly wider than bottom (approximately 60/40 top-to-bottom) — centering is off but not catastrophically miscut. Corners show visible rounding on at least two corners (bottom-left and top-right discernible), consistent with VG to VG-EX range. Surface exhibits clear gloss loss and what appears to be light handling wear or possible soft crease in the upper portion of the card, though the watermark obscures precise surface assessment. Edges appear somewhat rough but consistent with normal 1966 Topps production cuts; overall condition profile points to a PSA 3 (VG) grade, with a slim chance of 4 if the crease-like marks are just scan artifacts — back condition unknown and could move this range.

Centering estimate: left border notably wider than right (~60/40 L/R), top and bottom borders appear roughly even (~50/50 T/B) - centering is below NM range but not catastrophic. The card shows significant visible surface creasing across the upper-left quadrant and through the center area - these are hard creases consistent with a VG or lower grade. Corners appear rounded, particularly the upper-left and lower-right, with evident wear. Gloss appears largely gone with noticeable surface scuffing; the watermark prevents full assessment of the center surface. Given the hard creases, rounded corners, and apparent gloss loss, this card grades in the Good-to-VG range (PSA 2-3), with creasing likely keeping it at the lower end.

Centering estimate: left border ~12%, right border ~8%, top border ~10%, bottom border ~10% — left/right reads roughly 60/40 to 65/35, which is acceptable, top/bottom appears close to 50/50. The upper-left corner shows visible rounding and wear consistent with heavy handling; the upper-right corner also appears soft and rounded. The lower corners are harder to assess at this angle but show similar rounding consistent with a VG to VG-EX card. Surface shows gloss loss across the image area and the borders appear slightly toned/dingy, consistent with age and handling. The seller's 'GOOD' self-assessment aligns with the visible corner rounding and likely surface wear; without evidence of hard creases or staining visible in this image the card could reach VG (3), but the degree of corner degradation and gloss loss keeps this in the 2–4 range, with VG (3) as the most likely single grade.

Centering estimate: left border appears notably narrower than right (approximately 70/30 left-to-right), top border slightly narrower than bottom (roughly 60/40 top-to-bottom) – centering is off but not catastrophic. Corners: all four corners show visible rounding/softening consistent with EX to VG-EX range; no corner is sharp. Edges appear reasonably intact with the rough-cut texture typical of this 1966 Topps issue – no over-penalization applied for edge texture per vintage norms. Surface shows some gloss loss and what appears to be light wear; no obvious creases are visible from this photo, though the image resolution limits definitive crease detection. The combination of corner wear, centering deficiency, and gloss loss points to EX (5) as the most likely grade, with VG-EX (4) possible if corners are more rounded than visible here, and EX-MT (6) possible only if the corners hold up better under closer inspection.

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably narrower than right (~60/40 L/R favoring right), top border slightly wider than bottom (~55/45 T/B) – centering is off but not catastrophically so, likely within EX-VG-EX territory on that dimension alone. Corners: all four corners show visible rounding under even casual inspection at this resolution, consistent with a VG to VG-EX card; no corners appear sharp. Surface: the card shows some general gloss loss across the face, and there appears to be a light surface crease or wear line in the lower-left quadrant of the image area – difficult to confirm definitively due to glare and angle. Edges: appear reasonably intact with no obvious tears; rough cut edges are normal for this issue and not penalized. The sleeve glare on the right side obscures full edge and corner detail, widening the range; a back inspection and corner macro would be needed to confirm grade.

Centering estimate: left border appears notably wider than right (roughly 70/30 L/R), top and bottom borders appear closer to 55/45 — off-center but not miscut. Corners show visible rounding on all four, most apparent at lower-left and upper-right, consistent with a VG range card. Surface shows general gloss loss and what appears to be light toning/wear across the image area; some creasing or surface stress is suggested by the texture visible near the upper portion of the card, though the angle limits a definitive crease call. Edges appear rough but that is normal for 1966 Topps Batman; no tears or writing are visible, but the overall wear profile — rounded corners, gloss loss, possible surface crease — points to a PSA 3 VG as the most likely grade, with a 2 possible if the suspected crease confirms on inspection.

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (roughly 60/40 L-R favoring right), top border slightly thinner than bottom (approximately 55/45 T-B) — centering is off but not severely so, likely within EX range. Corners show light-to-moderate rounding on at least the visible upper-left and lower-left corners; the lower-right corner appears slightly softer as well, suggesting wear consistent with EX to VG-EX territory. Surface gloss appears moderate with some visible wear and possible light scuffing; no obvious creases are detectable from this photo, though the image resolution limits certainty about subtle surface flaws. Edges look reasonably clean with the rough-cut texture normal for 1966 Topps Batman; no major chipping or tears visible — a single front photo prevents full assessment of the back and all four corner tips at close range, widening the range.

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (roughly 60/40 R favored), top border slightly wider than bottom (approximately 55/45), so centering is moderate but not severe — consistent with a 6 or better on that axis alone. Corners: the angled photo makes fine corner assessment difficult, but the lower-left and upper-right corners show what appears to be light rounding rather than sharp points, suggesting wear in the EX to VG-EX range. Edges appear reasonably clean with no obvious nicks visible at this resolution; rough cut texture is normal for this issue and not penalized. Surface shows some light gloss loss and possible minor print wear consistent with age, but no creases are visible — however the photo angle and resolution cannot rule out a soft crease on the right side. Back is unseen, limiting confidence; range widened accordingly.

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (roughly 60/40 L-R favoring right), top border appears slightly narrower than bottom (roughly 55/45 T-B) — centering is off but not severely so, likely in the 65-70/35-30 range which is consistent with a 7 ceiling before other defects. Corners are difficult to assess at this resolution and angle, but the lower-left and lower-right corners appear to show some rounding/softness, suggesting at least light wear consistent with EX to VG-EX range. Edges appear reasonably intact with no obvious nicks visible, which is typical for this issue. Surface gloss is hard to evaluate from this photo — no obvious creases are visible confirming seller's claim, but print quality, toning, and fine corner detail cannot be reliably assessed from this single overhead shot; the wide range reflects genuine uncertainty from photo limitations.







