1966 Topps Batman Red Bat #44A Batman on Broadway

Every grade of this card
| Grade | Live | Asking range | Last confirmed sale | Est. grade (ours) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 15 | $2.88 – $10.05 | $5.50 2026-11-08 | 3.7 |
| PSA 3 | 0 | — | — | — |
| GMA 3 | 0 | — | — | — |
| PSA 4 | 0 | — | — | — |
| PSA 4.5 | 0 | — | — | — |
| PSA 7 | 0 | — | $38.00 2026-10-26 | — |
Confirmed sales — all grades
| Date | Grade | Price | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-08 | Raw | $5.50 | HIGH |
| 2026-11-07 | Raw | $3.81 | HIGH |
| 2026-10-26 | PSA 7 | $38.00 | HIGH |
| 2026-10-04 | Raw | $0.99 | HIGH |
| 2026-09-15 | Raw | $1.99 | HIGH |
| 2026-09-12 | Raw | $8.50 | HIGH |
| 2026-09-11 | Raw | $2.31 | HIGH |
| 2026-09-08 | Raw | $1.25 | HIGH |
| 2026-09-01 | Raw | $3.25 | HIGH |
| 2026-08-29 | Raw | $23.50 | HIGH |
| 2026-08-17 | Raw | $7.95 | HIGH |
| 2026-08-11 | Raw | $7.95 | HIGH |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (roughly 65/35 L-R), top and bottom borders look reasonably balanced at approximately 55/45 T-B — centering is off but not severely so. Corners show light-to-moderate wear with some rounding visible, particularly on the upper right and lower right, consistent with EX to EX-MT range. Surface gloss appears present with no obvious creases detected in this scan; print quality looks typical for the issue with no egregious snow or toning noted on the white borders. Back is not visible so hidden creases or staining cannot be ruled out, and corner wear is difficult to judge precisely without macro shots, warranting a widened range of 5–7.

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (roughly 70/30 L-R), top border slightly wider than bottom (approximately 60/40 T-B) — centering is off but not catastrophically so for this series. Corners: at least two corners (upper-left and lower-left) show visible rounding and/or wear; upper-right and lower-right are harder to assess due to camera angle but appear similarly soft. Surface: some gloss loss is apparent, consistent with moderate handling; no creases are clearly visible in the image though the photo angle and resolution make it difficult to rule out light surface creasing entirely. Edges appear intact without obvious nicks; rough cut texture is normal for this 1966 Topps issue and is not penalized. Overall condition presents as VG-EX to EX range, with corner rounding being the primary grade limiter.

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (approximately 70/30 L/R), top border slightly wider than bottom (approximately 60/40 T/B) — off-center but not severely miscut. All four corners show visible rounding and wear, consistent with heavy handling; at least two corners (upper-left, lower-left) appear notably blunted rather than merely soft. Surface shows significant gloss loss across the image area and evidence of general wear; there appears to be possible light creasing or surface wrinkling in the upper portion of the card, though the angle makes it difficult to confirm definitively. Edges appear worn but intact with no visible tears or paper loss. The cumulative corner rounding, gloss loss, and probable surface wear place this firmly in the VG to VG-EX range; the back is not visible and could reveal additional defects that push the grade lower.

Centering estimate: left border appears notably wider than right (roughly 70/30 L-R), top and bottom borders appear more balanced at approximately 55/45 T-B — centering is off horizontally but not catastrophically so. Corners are difficult to assess precisely at this resolution and with the watermark present; they appear to show some rounding/softening, consistent with light to moderate wear, suggesting EX to VG-EX range. Edges look reasonably clean with no obvious major nicks visible but the scan resolution limits confidence. Surface shows no obvious creases from this view but gloss level is hard to assess through the watermark and image compression; the card appears to have decent but not pristine surface quality. The Comc.com watermark and moderate scan resolution prevent confident assessment of fine corner detail, gloss, and subtle surface defects — the range is widened accordingly.